There is no convincing evidence that this occurs. One sensitive test is to look at the Cepheid Variable stars in nearby galaxies such as the galaxy M101 recently studied by the Hubble Space Telescope. The time it takes the stars to vary their brightness is determined by the Law of Gravity, and a variety of other laws having to do with nuclear physics, thermodynamics and the like. When astronomers use these stars, and compare them with nearby stars upon which the 'luminosity - period' calibration is determined, the stars in M101 turn out to have perfectly reasonable luminosities and the derived distances are in accord with other independent methods. SO, at least out to M101 which is 3.8 million parsecs away, the laws of nature seem to be the same as the ones we see around us.
Quasars are the farthest objects we know about. In the light of quasars we can detect the spectral lines of clouds and galaxies along the line of sight to the quasar. When astronomers study these line systems involving several elements, they discover that their relative abundances are similar to the abundances of carbon, oxygen and iron seen nearby. If the laws of physics were radically different, this would not be the case.
All this means is that we have been unable to detect any differences in the natural laws that, over billions of years and billions of light years, amount to anything larger than a few percent. Whether there could be departures at a level of say 0.5 percent or 0.001 percent is a very interesting and exciting idea, but not testable at the present time!