Bode's Law was not discovered by Bode, and it is most certainly not a law. It was discovered by Titus of Wittenberg in 1766, and popularized by Bode who was the Director of the Berlin Observatory in 1772. It is an arithmetic progression which is alledged to reproduce the distances of the planets from the Sun in Astronomical Units:
Planet Bode's Law Actual ............................................. Mercury 0.4 0.38 Venus 0.7 0.72 Earth 1.0 1.00 Mars 1.6 1.52 Asteroids 2.8 various Jupiter 5.2 5.20 Saturn 10.0 9.53 Uranus 19.6 19.18 Neptune 38.8 30.6 Pluto 77.2 39.4 .............................................and as you can see, it predicts a planet at 2.8 AU which isn't there, and it also gets the distances to Neptune and Pluto rather seriously wrong.
Because of the way that planets are believed to accrete themselves from the primordial dust cloud, planets act like gravitational vacuum cleaners, sweeping out bands of gas which eventually come into contact with their neighbors so that the sweeping process stops. The first planet to reach a critical size, grows the fastest and largest. A number of computer simulations have, over the years, revealed that planetary systems ought to eventually stabalize into a regular pattern of planetary distances as a consequence of both their initial formation spacing, and billions of years of gravitational perturbations, but Bode's Law is not a law which can be generalized to describe these other systems. This means that you are more or less free to hypothesize just about any spacings for planets which does not conflict with their masses. Large planets should not have nearby neighbors, for example. You would not expect to find a Jupiter-sized planet wedged in between the orbits of planets like the Earth and Mars, because the growth of such a large planet would have created a sweeping zone extending from the orbit of Venus to the orbit of Mars and so, Venus, Earth and Mars-like planets would never have had the chance to grow.